The New Tech - View Single Post

**metalray** · Oct 12, 2006, 10:27pm

Why would Vista require so much need of good hardware? It doesn't Look like it has more graphics then tiger (made in 2002). And transparency should not and does not require that much memory. Maybe the requirements go down once its released because that is ridiculous. For heaven sakes its an operating system. A year ago it was hard to find a GAME that required 1GIG. I think the early beta relies was a mistake because it is arousing responses that it 'itself' might have bugs. If you what something to look professional make it... ...well LOOK professional. Personally the so called NEW fitures are not new at all. I consider, as far as I can sean, it's a repetitive of win 1.0. (read about it within some history page)
Moving it further ahead in time was probably caused by the competition with the upcoming Mac os X (leopard). The prices are a bit confusing too. No, I'l use XP on my pc's until the second version of Vista is out.

Oct 12, 2006, 10:27pm
metalray Junior Member Posts: 19 Karma:	Why would Vista require so much need of good hardware? It doesn't Look like it has more graphics then tiger (made in 2002). And transparency should not and does not require that much memory. Maybe the requirements go down once its released because that is ridiculous. For heaven sakes its an operating system. A year ago it was hard to find a GAME that required 1GIG. I think the early beta relies was a mistake because it is arousing responses that it 'itself' might have bugs. If you what something to look professional make it... ...well LOOK professional. Personally the so called NEW fitures are not new at all. I consider, as far as I can sean, it's a repetitive of win 1.0. (read about it within some history page) Moving it further ahead in time was probably caused by the competition with the upcoming Mac os X (leopard). The prices are a bit confusing too. No, I'l use XP on my pc's until the second version of Vista is out.