Welcome, Guest. Log in or register for free.
 |
 You are currently browsing our forums as a guest, and that means you are missing out on many valuable features. To participate in the discussions, download attachments and more -- you need to create your own personal profile. Creating a profile is fast, simple, and most importantly: FREE. So don't wait any longer, join our community today! What is The New Tech? TNT is a community for computer users. Hobbyists, professionals and newbies alike all contribute to the site. We offer a wide range of topics from computer hardware to software. If you like to stay up to date with your technology related news, then we are the perfect place for you. News, security warnings, tips and tricks, FAQ's and computer troubleshooting and help can all be found here on TNT. |
 |
Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Jan 29, 2007, 03:59am
|
Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS
|
|
Elite Member
Posts: 4,997
Karma:
|
kapaopango writes "Ars Technica is reporting that upgrade versions of Windows Vista Home Basic, Premium, and Starter Edition cannot be installed on a PC unless Windows XP or Windows 2000 is already installed. This is a change from previous versions of Windows, which only required a valid license key. This change has the potential to make disaster recovery very tedious. The article says: 'For its part, Microsoft seems to be confident that the Vista repair process should be sufficient to solve any problems with the OS, since otherwise the only option for disaster recovery in the absence of backups would be to wipe a machine, install XP, and then upgrade to Vista. This will certainly make disaster recovery a more irritating experience.'"
More... |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06pm.
Your link here
Related Links